This used to work for me and then it failed. I want to return only those items that contain all the filters, not at least one filter as it is doing now. WHat is wrong here?
private IQueryable<IndexItem> FilteredIndex (IQueryable<IndexItem> index, IEnumerable<string> filters)
{
var filteredIndex= from f in filters.AsQueryable()
where f.Length>0
from i in index
where i.FilterNames.Contains(f)
select i;
return filteredIndex;
}
-
How about something like:
foreach(string s in filters) { if(s.Length == 0) continue; string tmp = s; // because of "capture" problem index = index.Where(i => i.FilterNames.Contains(tmp)); } return index;This applies a succession of
Whereclauses, covering all the filters - essentiallyAND.zsharp : what is "capture"?CVertex : @zsharp the lambda inside of Where() is a closure. the variable s for that iteration must be kept otherwise it'll be different by the time Where lambda is executed. See closures.Marc Gravell : Because we use "s" in a lambda, it is actually treated (by the compiler) as a field on a compiler-generated class (for complex reasons). The problem is that the nature of "foreach" means that otherwise you'd only get one of them, and you'd have n times Where([last filter]). -
Turn it around. What you want is those items in index where every item in FilterNames has a corresponding entry in filters. I'm not sure how performant it'd be, but a count comparison should do. Something like:
private IQueryable<IndexItem> FilteredIndex(IQueryable<IndexItem> index, IEnumerable<string> filter) { var filteredIndex = from i in index where (from s in i.FilterNames where filter.Contains(s) select s).Count() == i.FilterNames.Count select i; return filteredIndex; } -
Straight forward. For a given item from index check that it is true for all filters that the given item contains the filter. With this just select all items from index for that the given condition is true.
index.Where(item => filters.All(filter => item.FilterNames.Contains(filter)))I am not sure if the check for length greater than zero is required, nut it is easily integrated.
index.Where(item => filters.All(filter => (filter.Length > 0 ) || (item.FilterNames.Contains(filter))))It works with LINQ to Objects and I guess it does what you want, but I am not sure if it works with LINQ to SQL.
0 comments:
Post a Comment